comparison

Kubota vs Rato Engines: Which Is Right for You

AGT Equipment Team
6 min read
Quick Answer: Kubota engines offer more power, longer life (8,000+ hours), and better parts availability for daily commercial use. Rato engines cost less and are reliable for occasional use under 500 hours/year.

Overview

AGT mini excavators use either Kubota or Rato diesel engines. Both are proven, reliable engines—but they serve different needs.

Kubota Engines

Used in: DM12X, CFG-40UF

Kubota is a Japanese manufacturer known worldwide for small diesel engines. Their engines power equipment from brands like Bobcat, Kubota, and Caterpillar.

Advantages

  • Higher horsepower per liter
  • Longer expected service life (8,000+ hours)
  • Excellent parts availability worldwide
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Lower noise and vibration

Best For

Daily commercial use, rental fleets, contractors who need maximum reliability.

Rato Engines

Used in: H15R

Rato is a Chinese engine manufacturer producing reliable diesel engines at lower cost. Their engines are widely used in agricultural and construction equipment.

Advantages

  • Lower initial cost
  • Simpler mechanical design
  • Easier field repairs
  • Good fuel tolerance

Best For

Occasional use (under 500 hours/year), property owners, budget-conscious buyers.

Direct Comparison

FactorKubotaRato
Horsepower24.8-54 HP13.5 HP
Service Life8,000+ hours5,000+ hours
Parts CostHigherLower
AvailabilityExcellentGood
Price Premium+$3,000-5,000Base

Frequently Asked Questions